Anterior and Posterior are different kinds of hip replacement surgery and provide effective benefits to the patient. In the Anterior hip replacement approach, the surgeon gets a more limited view of the hip joint during surgery, making the process technically challenging. In the case of Posterior hip replacement, the surgeon gets a better view of the hip joint than in the Anterior hip replacement approach. Through these hip replacement procedures, several hip joint problems can be cured and reduce hip joint pain, restore mobility and decrease the pain of arthritis. During hip replacement surgery, a surgeon removes the damaged sections of the hip joint and replaces them with artificial joints that remove pain and improve functions.
The surgical steps of both hip replacement approaches are different from each other. Both have different short term and long term effects on the human body and provide different benefits to the patient's body. Incision location is one of the most significant differences between anterior and posterior hip replacement surgeries.
The location of the incision will completely determine the postsurgical scar.
This is another difference between anterior and posterior hip replacement surgeries. After creating a surgical incision, the muscles must be pushed aside or cut to access the hip's ball and socket.
The posterior approach produced greater muscular strength than the direct lateral approach, which resulted in a greater increase in abduction strength than the anterior approach.
According to the 3-month follow-up research, no statistically significant differences
between these replacements were found. The operated legs were 18% weaker in leg press and 15% weaker in abduction than the unoperated legs, and the results were similar between them.
Read Also - 11 Tips for Choosing An Orthopedic Surgeon
By consulting Dr. Ajinkya Desale, you can get the most effective orthopedic and joint replacement treatment in India
All hip replacements are required to dislocate the hip joints and shape the bones to implant prosthetic hip joint components. Both hip replacement approach present specific technical ease.
Based on the technical ease difference before applying the anterior approach, adequate training is essential because an immense technical difficulty is associated with this approach.
According to the research, two years after r surgeries, 99.4% of patients said they had relief from pain, and 98.8% said their ability to move was improved.